<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palm Pre and iTunes: POSITIONING FOR GROWTH, FLEXIBILITY OR STEALING&#8230;&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profitsprinciples.com/blog/2009/08/06/positioning-for-growth-flexibility-or-stealing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profitsprinciples.com/blog/2009/08/06/positioning-for-growth-flexibility-or-stealing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Booth</title>
		<link>http://profitsprinciples.com/blog/2009/08/06/positioning-for-growth-flexibility-or-stealing/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profitsprinciples.com/blog/?p=398#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Rosalie,

You raise some good question re. Palm vs. iTunes.  IMHO, and since the Pre is only one product, the copy-cat slice is certainly legitimate in free markets but also directly impacts Apple to be a better innovator.

As to the viability of Palm's positioning, their EBITDA is healthy and is reflected somewhat in the stock prices throughout the competition of Apple and other phone+++ devices.

Fighting dirty?  Gee, I just don't see how that is an issue from the global perspective and what you did bring up is perhaps a flaw taken advantage of.  The bigger question, then is about values...corporate and the ROI for consumers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosalie,</p>
<p>You raise some good question re. Palm vs. iTunes.  IMHO, and since the Pre is only one product, the copy-cat slice is certainly legitimate in free markets but also directly impacts Apple to be a better innovator.</p>
<p>As to the viability of Palm&#8217;s positioning, their EBITDA is healthy and is reflected somewhat in the stock prices throughout the competition of Apple and other phone+++ devices.</p>
<p>Fighting dirty?  Gee, I just don&#8217;t see how that is an issue from the global perspective and what you did bring up is perhaps a flaw taken advantage of.  The bigger question, then is about values&#8230;corporate and the ROI for consumers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

